Inland Empires opening reception Sept. 7, 2012. Image courtesy of Artcite Inc. |
Mike
Marcon’s exhibition Inland Empires is
a set of seven installation pieces inciting discourse on topics of national
identity.
Although I possess a Canadian
citizenship, I cannot relate to the legends and ancestry of the Canadian
frontier that I suspect many other Canadians do possess, because I did not
learn anything about Canadian history until the 7th grade, which
appropriately coincided with a new school, assimilation into the main class from
humiliating ESL segregation (i.e. assimilation into the English language), and a pubescent romanticized
longing for something other than the social and familial nightmares of the
(then) present, all of which conglomerated with the discovery of “the Canadian
explorer” as something desirable, strong, masculine, and factually epic.
Arbitrary vision of Jacques Cartier |
Stills from Come and See (1985). |
The feeling of romance was also
founded in pre-immigration childhood encounters with exotic literature such as
“The Call of the Wild” by Jack London, and other such exoticized Russian
translations about Canadian wilderness. One story described a man who had to eat frogs
to survive (I hope I am not mistaking a Russian story for a Canadian one… but
either way, my memory must have lumped them together for similarities in behavioral
tendencies). Gruesome and uncanny, these stories spoke of
valor, endurance, and tragedy, and in my mind were also chronologically and
thematically paired with socialist WWII films and stories about partisans and
comrades roasting on the battlefield, smelling of pork (as a veteran imparted to my third grade class). I digress.
All of the above is an
afterthought – a distribution of my own weight, the prelude to which has little
to do with the western frontier or the WW’s.
My initial experience with this work rests on formal, material, and
spatial aspects, such as the compression of all elements into a contained unit,
held by the mindful organization of selected objects, crafted to sit in a solid
framework of wood (which to some extent itself speaks of western expansion – man over nature: landscape cultivated into
cabinets, shredded for books, for containment of knowledge).
Land Cart (2012). Image courtesy of Artcite Inc. |
The first piece I encountered is Land Cart. I incidentally came upon this
piece when it was a work in progress, in the sculpture studio of Lebel. Mike Marcon was not in the vicinity. The work was described to me by someone else,
in fondness of the labour implied upon it.
We commented on the finish of the metal, the crafted emblem of a tree, the
qualities of the salvaged wood. The hand
drawn outline of a bird triggered an association with Neil Young & Crazy
Horse album cover Zuma, which may or may not be worth mentioning. It was with
this pretext (Neil Young aside) that I approached the work in the installation.
I noticed compositional similarities, which, in a vehicular attitude of
specifics, later gave way to ideological narrative. The specifics I am referring to are such
details as an antique lantern, rows of jars containing nails and water, gasoline
cans, memorabilia, an open drawer filled with rows of batteries painted
army-green. The latter, in combination
with tin cans (ideal for mountaineering and trenches), large roll of antique bandages,
and a framed illustration in the Russian language instructing “This is how to
bandage the arm to the body”, are all specifics which certainly contributed to
my eventual narrative digression about the WW’s.
What I find
peculiar about this body of work is that it is not only an assortment of stuff
pertaining to a theme. There are found
objects, selected literature, negated literature (books treated as things, as
appearance), but there are also investments of gesture on the part of the
artist which go beyond mere arrangement and presentation of objects. He has carefully cast in bronze figurines,
shims, emblems, friezes of his own design, and a handsome ram head with
rope horns. He has spray painted accents of black to make more obvious the aged
aesthetic of the wood surface, and the tin cans are shined to a uniform sheen. The work for
some reason had to be claimed, or marked, by the artist. Although I find these gestures a bit
puzzling, they are not altogether out of place, and do function to contain the
work, as a seal, to make it obvious that this is all just imagery, that it is not
about the degradation of material in the open air, but about the world of
signifiers. Things become thoughts.
Weapons of Winning (2010). Image courtesy of Artcite Inc. |
Objects here are
compartmentalized, as if to pluck and place from a series of random, but
inevitably associated images, fished from a pool of ideology most people in
this part of the world can relate to, at least semantically. Consider the Mickey Mouse perched over Northern Allegory no. 2, and the stacks of
visual ephemera on cards, which a viewer may choose from arbitrarily, as if
pulling a file from a filing cabinet. Because
the objects are linearly, uniformly, and tightly distributed within one unit, and
because the works converse with each other in the gallery space, the objects do
not appear to have any particular hierarchy of importance. Repetition here is not greater than the singular. Even the pieces with the light boxes do not
seem to imply too much emphasis on the distinctness of the light box or video,
versus the roughened items in the composition. For example, the iconic image of
the sinking ship in Northern Allegory no.
5, which is a video slowed down enough to deny the horror of the event and
acting as a still impression, is just as much of a focal point as the dirty
gloves in Northern Allegory no. 6. The
sign “How to become a legend” below the sinking vessel becomes not about dying
in a shipwreck, but about dying in the registered appearance of an image. To me,
these are not narratives, but bundles of information, carried by stuff.
Detail of Northern Allegory no. 5 (2012). Image courtesy of Artcite Inc. |
Each piece in this exhibition can be likened
to a ship, descending with the slow pace of history, as allegories should, nothing
but by-products of certain activities, posthumous remnants of vehicles, which
carry mental records via linguistic and object-based image realities. That
is too grandiose of a conclusion. Let us humbly part with this: If Jan Svankmajer
had a dream about Canada, he would have Mike Marcon among his pals.
No comments:
Post a Comment