external view of one ten park, with Oct.2-22 2012 window installations by Collette Broeders and Susan Gold. Image courtesy of Susan Gold. |
On Friday September 21, 2012, one ten park: a working space (110 Park St. W.) held an opening
reception for a brand new studio space in the core of downtown Windsor. The
space is hosted by four local artists, who are all of different age groups,
backgrounds, and methods of working. They are Alana Bartol, Collette Broeders,
Susan Gold, and Arturo Herrera.
Currently on view in the one
ten park windows are Collette Broeders’ “Synchronicity No. 5”, which is a drawing that came as a result of
meditative performative gestures, and
Susan Gold’s “Persistence of
Insincerity 2010 -2012”, which questions the gloss of appearances and
authenticity. The two
works are installed October 2 – 22. The
subsequent installation will reflect discourse on the existence and function of
literature, as it will be in concurrence with the annual BookFest Windsor (October 25 -27).
view from the entrance. Susan Gold's (foreground) and Arturo Herrera's (background) spaces. |
While Arturo Herrera’s space is riddled with paint paraphernalia, photographs, props, lighting equipment, and hat contraptions, Alana Bartol’s mannequin guards her collections of nature-stuffs, among pinned-up reference materials, books, and a grassy Ghillie suit beside the photographic aftermaths of its performance. While Susan Gold’s area is decorated with reproductions of flora and fauna, clad with an artifice of herbaria wallpaper, Collette Broeders’ space has a transcendent methodical aura, intending on form, mapping, and placement. In between, the lines begin to blur. Is this a communal garbage can? Whose box is this? Whose bag is that?
Arturo Herrera's space. |
I approached the ‘group’ with a few matters of curiosity, as follows. [Alana and Collette were unfortunately not in the position of leisure to indulge my curiosity at this time.]
Sasha Opeiko: Someone
asked me recently if one ten park is
an artist collective. My response was that you are not a collective, but
individual artists simply sharing a space.
Was that a reasonable response, and how do you feel about the
possibility of that kind of confusion occurring in the future, in relation to
your own practice?
Arturo Herrera: We
have been called different names ever since we got together. The most popular
is a gallery. I don't think I feel influenced in this respect by the public.
Susan Gold: Yes, we are four artists sharing studio
space. But one ten park is more than a business arrangement and is a
developing concept. But right from the beginning we noticed shared needs and
desires among us. We all needed dedicated studio space to develop our art
practice. We all liked the idea of being on street level in the downtown core.
All of us have affinities in our practice to installation work,
process, and community arts. (None of us could afford the space by
ourselves.)
SO: On a similar
note – what kind of changes, if any, have you noticed in your creative
processes now that you are sharing a workspace? Is this the kind of shared work
environment you’ve encountered time and time again in the past, or is this a
brand new venture for you? What is so particular about this specific conglomeration
of people and ideas?
AH: Having
just earned my BFA, I really enjoyed working in a room with others. The shared
space I think is more a convenience than wanting to share. I mean, I do
enjoy being with others, but I think we all got together for many reasons; and
one important one was that we couldn't afford the space by ourselves.
SG: We also have noticed
skill sets among us that move us along in exciting ways. It seems one ten
park has a life of its own and we are all part of it.
Changes
in creative process are notable. First there is always the influence of
the space and particular possibilities of the space that inform my work
immediately. I am normally influenced by the potentials of the space and
architectural details of the space. The high walls are number one. The window
possibilities. The light from the windows. The cornices and funky wallpaper and
framing on one of my walls. The skills and ideas of others working in the room.
The space and situation has and will undoubtedly influence and stimulate my
work.
Susan Gold's space. |
SO: It is evident
that the four of you feel more connected to the general public in this space.
It is a prime location, lots of foot traffic… Although you have individual work areas, there
are no walls or barriers physically portioning off your space. What is the role
of privacy in your work, and do you ever feel, in this new space, that you are
lacking your own walls?
AH: I
think all depends: at the beginning I was worried about stepping onto others
space when I work with my photo shoots or with models... I require lots of
walking space. But as we got to know each other the invisible walls
disappeared.
SG: Loving the space and not
dividing it with walls was one thing that we immediately agreed on. But
the need for some working space and storage space we could call our own was
arranged easily. We also know that we couldn’t actually work in a showcase or a
store. So one ten park is not a gallery but rather a working space. Loving
the windows! And immediately wanting to install work in them was another thing
that was immediate!
We
then had to make decisions on the clean up, the painting, miscellaneous
purchases, announcements and signage - down to the font and punctuation. Some
of these decisions were made easily. Some took scores of emails – but reaching
consensus is not a quick and easy process. We kind of enjoy working through
everyone’s comments.
SO: (to SG)
I suspect such negotiations aid in the makeshift definition of personal boundaries
as well. Making known and extending your
comfort zone/desires for the health of immediate neighbourhood and coexistence,
perhaps allows for overlaps and intersections with others, which allow for
a kind of partial immersion in the comfort zones/desires of your
neighbours. You speak of negotiating
practical matters, such as signage and purchases, but such mundane necessity is
part of creative discourse as well. They
are nonetheless physical points of connection between one person and another
(eye contact, fingertip nexus of digital correspondence, time invested in
acknowledging mundane questions), without which other, more creatively profound
connections would not be very probable.
That is my own intuitive tangent from what I think you are talking about,
when you mention the enjoyment of working through everyone’s comments….
However, returning to the related topic of privacy, and perhaps the necessity
or unavoidability of private experience…
There is a Boris Groys essay titled “The Loneliness of the
Project”, which discusses ideas around the insistence on project-based art
practices (the proposal toward an end, and allotted times to achieve that
end). One detail of this essay
references the tendency for creators to isolate themselves, once they have
secured the funding or support to complete a project, such as an exhibition or
a residency. This kind of isolation is necessary
and socially acceptable, because without investing every waking moment toward
the project and temporarily suspending obligations to friends, family, and
other activities, the project – deemed as a worthy effort for society – would
not be realized. How do you respond to
this line of thought? Do you yourself function on a project basis? Does one
ten park allow you to feel less isolated during the rigorous time of
production?
Alana Bartol's space, from Collette's vantage point. |
SG: Role of privacy. For me that remains to be
known. I have never worked in a studio situation with other artists. But my
husband and I have always shared studio space successfully. I know I need total
privacy at some times to be completely absorbed, alone with my thoughts,
and not self conscious of external judgment – I guess that is what I would mean
by “free”. But I find myself alone in the space often and I think I will come
to feel alone – with the others – to have the situation work successfully for
me. On the other hand, I have always found it productive to work off the
productivity and energy of others working. And that is definitely happening at one
ten park. So there you have a productive contradiction. And there are many
in creative work!
So
although this space represents different things in each of our practices, there
are things in common that are making this an exciting project.
AH:
Previously I was in a different studio space up the street,
and it was a 200 square feet room with a large window. I felt too isolated, I
felt desperately in finding a new space as soon as possible. But I think it
depends on the project you are working on. Isolation is good for painting.
SO: Ditto.
As an aside to the previous question, what is the rhythm of the studio
like, now that you have more or less settled in the space?
AH: Hmmm, at first I wanted to keep track of who was coming in
or out just so I didn't interfere on anybody. But then I just didn't care. As a
matter of fact I am thinking I would like to build the traditional studio walls
that photographers used to use in the early 1900s so light would not come in
inside the studio... Like a laberinto!
SO: Have you connected with any other shared
studio spaces in the Windsor area? And
if not, is that a possibility you would be interested in and for what
reason? Do you intend to form or
maintain relationships with other arts organizations in the area (who)?
AH: Yes, but so far I don't think we have socialized too much.
Just recently we had a walking tour during Artcite's summer art festival.
SG: We of course love being
connected to the “general public”, downtown street life and especially to our
immediate neighbours: Artcite Inc., Broken City Lab, Print House, Workers
Action Centre. We have no immediate plans for formal collaboration but
informally we are already linked into possibilities for downtown cultural
developments.
SO: Lastly, what are you working on now?
SG: What am I working on now? I am developing installation
material and possibilities for a project, Decorating
the End of the World. The work is a little divided between my Nobel
studio, one ten park and my work
space at home. But I am gradually pulling it together for the May 2013
exhibition at the Mackintosh. There are several exhibitions I am involved in in
2013 and 2014 so the work is not isolated to one exhibition but is developing
organically (and undirected) as well. I am traveling to Norway in October to
gather additional material for future work.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This interview occurred a couple of weeks ago. Susan Gold is currently in Norway.
Copyright Alana Bartol. Photo credit Arturo Herrera. |
"Forms of Awareness: Ghillie Suit, is a series that reveals and examines the
prevailing set of aesthetic and environmental concerns in North American
suburban communities… Through public walks and "un-camouflagings" in
city and suburban streets, parks, fields, suburban neighbourhoods, new housing
developments and naturalized spaces in urban areas, Ghillie inspires many
reactions including fear, awe, confusion, anger, wonder and laughter… The
ghillie suit is traditionally used by military snipers and hunters to
camouflage the human body, allowing the wearer to blend into various 'natural'
landscapes such as woods, prairies and swamplands. As Ghillie, I investigate
the shape shifting abilities of the human body… while also questioning our
assumptions about gender.”
Collette Broeders:
"What I'm currently working on. Although I have many sort of ongoing projects, my main focus has been
performative drawings such as the one you see currently at the one ten
windows. A little about the work follows.
The series of Synchronicity drawings
investigate symmetrical, repetitive motion using my body as an instrument to
form a rhythmic pattern of line. I execute the drawing in a
hypnotic tempo and meditative state that manifests itself into physical form to
unite the viewer with the intimacy of the experience. The drawings
are performed in private and public space and examine the limitations of the
body with continuous motion over several hours until a state of exhaustion is
reached.
The drawings begin with intense
spontaneous gestures within a small space that replicate, synchronize and
divide and gradually swell and burst to the outwardly extended body. Like
a cell dividing, the internal self-generating energy of the process is
bilaterally and equally distributed as the image grows. Ultimately, the
drawing becomes a study of contrast showing the peaceful-chaotic, soothing-painful and joyful-desperate moments of the performance."
CB adds a story:
"When we first moved into one
ten park, construction immediately began at the apartments above us.
There were several vaults placed within the studio making and scaffolding on
the outer building surrounding one ten park. We decided to make
use of the surrounding scaffolding. Arturo had painted several images
that led to the door of one ten park and in July, I completed a synchronicity
performance drawing on the scaffolding that allowed the community to engage in
the public performance. The drawing was eventually dismantled by the
construction workers and may be in circulation at another construction site
which is sort of interesting too!"
Synchronicity No.4:
Thanks Sasha for covering this.
ReplyDeleteYou actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward to your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!
ReplyDeleteskip bin hire brisbane
hire a skip bin near me